ASA Compliance GroupAmazon Seller Account ReinstatementParallel import appeal

Amazon parallel import and gray market appeal services.We take full ownership of your case.

Amazon flagged your products as parallel imports or gray-market goods? We compare the product versions, sourcing, labels and warranty records, then coordinate the appeal with the legal review your case needs.

Founder-led review. Most first replies within about an hour.

Or Shamosh speaking at the European Seller Conference in Prague, March 2025
Or Shamosh, Founder of ASA Compliance Group
European Seller Conference. Prague, March 2025.
  • 5,500+ cases handled
  • 98% historical reinstatement rate
  • Since 2016

Last verified as of .

Amazon Sellers Appeal by Or Shamosh

Amazon Seller Account Deactivated? You’re in Expert Hands.

Founder-led enforcement expertise backed by executive leadership and specialist teams in Seller Central.

Founder, ASA Compliance Group · International speaker on Amazon enforcement and reinstatement

When your Amazon account or listings are suspended, every moment counts, and genuine expertise matters. Or Shamosh, founder of ASA Compliance Group, has spent over 10 years mastering the complexities of Amazon’s policies, compliance guidelines, and seller reinstatements. His LL.B. background informs how he reads Performance Notifications and frames compliance strategy; complex matters still run through ASA Compliance Group’s in-house legal department and outside counsel when required. He has led work across 5,500+ cases. His work spans seller account suspensions, listing appeals and compliance cases.

Or regularly shares his knowledge at seller conferences and webinars worldwide, including Prague March 2025, Sofia April 2025 and April 2026, Warsaw May 2026, with an upcoming UK appearance in October 2026. See conference appearances, explore seller webinars, read the restricted keywords guide, or see client stories in Testimonials.

AmazonSellersAppeal is operated by ASA Compliance Group, with dedicated appeal, legal, IP, and compliance teams in Seller Central. Michael Gourin and Smadar Popovski, alongside Or, lead intake and case operations; specialist staff join when your Performance Notification requires it.

Or Shamosh, Founder and CEO, ASA Compliance Group, Amazon account reinstatement specialist

Or Shamosh · Founder & CEO

Why this matters
  • Your case log only gets one chance to stay consistent
  • Every submission is compared against what already exists
  • Wrong moves slow reinstatement or shut it down entirely
  • Expert judgment before anything is submitted
Michael Gourin, Chief Commercial Officer, ASA Compliance Group
Executive leadership

Michael Gourin

Chief Commercial Officer

Product, marketing, partner channels, case intake & service structure

Owns product positioning, marketing, partner channels, and intake so sellers enter the right service path with clear scope and the right facts.

Smadar Popovski, Chief Operating Officer, ASA Compliance Group
Executive leadership

Smadar Popovski

Chief Operating Officer

Appeal execution, Seller Central operations & case sequencing

Runs Performance Notification review, POA execution, Seller Central follow-ups, and escalations with disciplined sequencing.

Ready to reinstate your account with confidence? Get my case strategy

Let's see what it will take to resolve this.

Why we ask: tell us what happened. A real person reviews what you send and replies in writing with your case strategy, including our assessment of the case and the approach we recommend. We also include the fee before you decide whether to proceed.

About 3 minutes. We save your progress as you go.

Start with your notice

How these cases usually start

Almost all of them begin with a sourcing decision that was commercially sensible and territorially invisible.

Goods bought for another region

A supplier offers the same product cheaper because it was produced for a different market. Everything about the transaction is ordinary, and the goods arrive carrying another market's assumptions.

Material regional differences

The version differs in ways a customer here would notice. This is where most parallel-import cases are actually decided, and where sellers most often underestimate what counts:

  • Voltage, plug type or frequency
  • Language on packaging, labelling and instructions
  • Formulation, ingredients or materials
  • Warranty coverage and who honours it
  • Model code or regional generation
  • Included accessories and components
  • Regulatory marks, certifications and safety approvals
  • Customer support and service availability

A difference that looks minor to a seller can be material to the analysis. Deciding it is immaterial from appearance is the single most common error in this type of case.

A territorial rights-owner complaint

The brand objects to distribution into this market specifically. The goods being authentic is common ground and does not answer the objection, which is about where they are being sold rather than what they are.

Where the same complaint alleges the goods are not genuine at all, it is a counterfeit claim and the evidence is different. Establish which is actually asserted before responding.

A warranty or regulatory mismatch

The product cannot be supported, certified or lawfully offered here in the form it arrived: a missing local certification, a warranty that does not travel, labelling that does not meet local requirements.

Customs released the shipment
Release or entry records can prove the import event and history.
What that does not settle
Final admissibility, trademark exhaustion, Amazon eligibility, regulatory compliance, or whether the differences are material.

An import documentation gap

The chain exists commercially and not on paper. Customs records, distribution terms and authorization for this territory are the documents that are usually missing, because nobody needed them until the complaint arrived.

Where the mismatch is really that the product does not match the listing it is attached to, that is a different item question rather than a territorial one.

Full-service appeal handling

You send the notice. We handle the case.

AmazonSellersAppeal by Or Shamosh reviews your parallel import and gray market notice and evidence, then manages your case in Seller Central.

  1. 01

    Review the notice and history

    We review the complaint, source market and selling marketplace to identify the regional product or distribution issue.

  2. 02

    Build the evidence and appeal

    We compare product versions, labels, sourcing and authorization records, and coordinate qualified legal review where the response requires it.

  3. 03

    Submit and follow through

    We manage the appropriate Seller Central response and any relevant rights-owner correspondence, then handle revisions and follow-ups.

Strategy, evidence, appeal writing, submissions and unlimited follow-ups and revisions within the agreed case scope.

Experience behind your appeal

Proof & results

Amazon seller enforcement is our daily work. Amazon Sellers Appeal has handled account, listing and compliance cases across global marketplaces.

Or Shamosh speaking to an audience at the European Seller Conference in Prague
Or Shamosh speaking at the European Seller Conference, Prague, March 2025.
5,500+Cases handled
98%*Historical reinstatement rate
Since 2016Amazon seller appeal specialists
About an hourMost first replies
Full ownershipStrategy, evidence, submissions and follow-ups
Case strategyA written assessment for eligible cases

* Historical results across ASA Compliance Group-managed enforcement cases. Last verified as of .

See more seller results · Watch client videos

Client reviews

What sellers say about Amazon Sellers Appeal

Real names and quotes from clients we’ve helped through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.

See all reviews

Evidence

Real sellers. Real reinstatements. Each case required a different approach.

Six short videos from sellers who worked with ASA Compliance Group through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.

Maia“After four months deactivated on a variation issue, others said they couldn’t help. Or got my business, and my dreams, back.”

Nasir“Five years using Or. Very professional and quick on listings, account issues, and safety concerns.”

Nimrod“Sharp, smart, and reliable. If you’re thinking about working with him, you should go for it.”

Eliran“He gives you honest odds upfront, straight with you, even when it’s not what you wanted to hear.”

Fozia“Eight years selling on Amazon. Or fixed every issue. Calm when I was panicking, always a successful outcome.”

Paul“Shut down overnight. Months with another expert failed. Or got us back in the UK and Europe. Or is your man.”

6 client video stories

Watch all client videos

When you’re ready, get your case strategy below. We’ll tell you if we’re the right fit.

Knowledge

What a parallel-import complaint means

ASA Compliance Group operates Amazon Sellers Appeal. On parallel-import files we build the comparison and the chain, and run the Seller Central route. Jurisdictional legal questions go to local counsel.

A parallel import is a genuine product sourced outside the distribution channel intended for the marketplace where it is offered. Sellers also know it as the gray market, which is a description rather than an accusation: the goods are real and the question is whether they may be sold here.

The risk can come from territorial trademark rights, exhaustion rules, material differences, warranty coverage, language or labelling, regulatory approval, plugs and voltage, formulation, model, packaging, importer identity, or a rights-owner complaint. Genuine does not automatically mean eligible, and that sentence is the whole page.

What has to be established before any defence is chosen:

The two markets

Where the goods were made for, and where they are being sold. The gap between those is the case.

The differences

Everything about the regional version that differs from the one this marketplace expects, however small it looks.

The complaint

Whether a rights owner filed, or Amazon acted on its own signal. Different routes out.

Legal rules here vary by jurisdiction and this page does not state them. A first-sale or exhaustion explanation that holds in one market does not carry to another, and Amazon's own European regulatory guidance warns about illegal parallel imports without supplying one worldwide rule. Where the answer turns on exhaustion, import legality or material-difference law, it belongs with qualified local counsel.

Two more terms are worth recognising when they appear, because which one a notice or complaint uses often indicates the argument being made: first sale and exhaustion for the doctrines a seller may be relying on, and material differences for the test of whether the imported unit differs from the authorised one. Grey market is the same thing as the gray market spelling above, not a separate category.

Appeals

Why DIY parallel-import appeals get rejected

Reviewers are looking at territory and differences. Most rejected responses prove the goods are real, which was never disputed.

Genuine, therefore allowed

Authenticity offered as the complete answer where the objection is about the market the goods were made for.

One market's rule everywhere

A first-sale or exhaustion explanation from one jurisdiction applied to a marketplace it does not govern.

Differences waved through

Warranty, language, labelling, formulation, voltage, accessories or certification treated as immaterial because they look small.

Invoices as eligibility

Purchase records that prove a transaction, sent to answer lawful import, market eligibility or authorization.

Contacting the owner early

The rights owner approached, or legal admissions made, before the jurisdiction and complaint have been reviewed.

Tax records and photographs

Documents proving purchase and appearance offered where territorial authority and equivalence were the questions.

Your evidence, explained

Amazon parallel import and gray market appeal: evidence checklist

A focused appeal connects your notice with verifiable records. Here is what we review: regional product differences, sourcing, labeling and marketplace requirements.

Diagnosis

Record the notice, any complaint identifier, the rights owner's identity, the listing, the marketplace, the source country and the market the goods were intended for. Establish whether the complaint asserts territorial rights, material differences, regulatory failure, or that the goods are not genuine at all.

The regional comparison

Put the version you sell beside the version this marketplace expects and record every difference with evidence, including the ones that appear trivial:

  • Model code, generation and identifiers
  • Voltage, plug and frequency
  • Language on pack, label and instructions
  • Formulation, ingredients or materials
  • Warranty terms and who honours them
  • Included accessories and components
  • Regulatory marks and certifications
  • Packaging and importer identity

Record differences without characterising them as immaterial. Whether a given difference is material is a legal standard in most jurisdictions, and it is answered by local counsel rather than by the person compiling the list.

The chain and the authority

Invoices and chain-of-supply records, supplier identity, customs and import documentation, and any distribution or authorization terms covering this territory. The last of those is what is usually missing, and it is what most directly answers a territorial objection. Be precise about what the customs paperwork does: release or entry evidence can prove import history, and it does not by itself establish final admissibility, trademark exhaustion, Amazon eligibility, regulatory compliance or the absence of material differences.

A direct invoice supports sourcing. It does not establish upstream authority to distribute into this marketplace, and Amazon's invoice requirements set what sourcing evidence must look like before it is even usable. Where the objection is about how the mark is used rather than where the goods came from, see trademark infringement; where traceability itself is contested, inauthentic product violations.

The route, and the boundary

Depending on the record: an evidence-led dispute, a rights-owner route including a possible retraction, a listing correction disclosing the version accurately, or withdrawal. A retraction resolves the complaint it names and leaves any separate catalog, regulatory or account issue open.

The boundary is firm. Organising the notice, the supply chain, the comparison and the records is operational. Trademark exhaustion, first sale, import legality, customs, distribution restrictions, regulatory approval and material-difference law are legal questions for qualified counsel in that specific jurisdiction.

Have ready when you submit intake

  • The notice and any complaint identifier
  • The marketplace, source country and intended market
  • Photographs of the product and packaging, all sides
  • The differences you already know about
  • Invoices, customs and import records
  • Any distribution or authorization terms
  • Every prior appeal, case and Amazon reply

If you do not know which market the goods were produced for, say so. It is usually recoverable from the packaging, the model code or the supplier, and it is the fact the rest of the analysis hangs on.

Amazon parallel import and gray market appeal FAQs

For sellers who already have the Performance Notification. Broader questions: full FAQ library.

Are genuine products always allowed as parallel imports?
No. Genuine goods can still create marketplace risk, because territorial trademark rights, exhaustion rules, warranty, labelling, language, formulation, voltage, regulatory approval, model, accessories and other material differences vary by jurisdiction. Identify the source country, the intended market, the destination marketplace and the exact complaint before choosing a defence.
What counts as a material difference?
A product or commercial characteristic that can matter to consumers or to the rights analysis: warranty, language, labelling, formulation, voltage, plug, accessories, regulatory marks, model, packaging, support or quality control. Compare the regional units systematically and obtain local legal review where the standard controls the answer.
Do invoices prove the right to sell in this marketplace?
Invoices prove a transaction and can support chain of supply, and they do not automatically establish lawful import, territorial rights, authorization, marketplace eligibility, regulatory compliance or the absence of material differences. Combine them with customs, distribution, product-comparison, warranty, label, regulatory and authorization records as the case requires.
Can a rights-owner retraction resolve the case?
It can be an effective route where the rights owner filed the complaint and submits a valid withdrawal through Amazon's required channel. Verify the complaint identifier, the listing, the marketplace and the scope of the retraction. Separate catalog, regulatory or account issues may remain even after the complaint is withdrawn.
When is local legal advice needed?
Where the response depends on trademark exhaustion, first sale, import legality, customs, distribution restrictions, regulatory approval, material-difference law or rights-owner negotiations in a specific jurisdiction. Operational work can organise the notice, the supply chain, the product comparison and the records, and should not supply definitive legal conclusions.
What do you need to start?
The notice and any complaint identifier, the marketplace and source country, photographs of the product and packaging, the differences you know about, your import and sourcing records, and every prior appeal or Amazon reply.
What is in the Case Strategy?
Your Case Strategy sets out our assessment of the notice, the evidence needed, the appeal approach and the next steps for your seller account or ASINs. We focus on regional product differences, sourcing, labeling and marketplace requirements. You receive a clear plan for preparing the response and managing the case.

Your case stays with one team for the evidence review, appeal, submissions and follow-ups.

Start here

Get a strategy for your parallel import and gray market appeal

Include the source country, the marketplace, and how the regional version differs. Four short steps. Or Shamosh reads every intake.

  • Every case is personally reviewed before we take it on.
  • Most first replies are sent within about an hour.
  • Eligible cases get a written Case Strategy tied to your Performance Notification.
Or Shamosh, Founder and CEO, ASA Compliance Group

Or Shamosh · Founder and lead strategist

5,500+ enforcement cases since 2016. Every intake is personally assessed before acceptance.

Send what you have, including prior DIY or agency appeals. We say what is viable in writing before you commit.

Questionnaire

If the questionnaire does not load, open intake on the account page.

What happens after you submit

  • You’ll receive a review email within about one hour.
  • If Amazon gave you a reply deadline, mention it in the form so we can time delivery to it.
  • If eligible, you receive a written Case Strategy: what is driving the enforcement, what we would argue, what evidence matters, and how we would run Seller Central.

Send the notice. Get the strategy.

If Amazon flagged genuine imported goods, start with the questionnaire.

For individual ASIN issues, explore listing reinstatement. For a different notice, browse all suspension types.