Amazon says the delivered product was different from the listing? We compare the unit, version, pack size and order records, then identify the mismatch and manage the appeal.
Founder-led review. Most first replies within about an hour.
Last verified as of .
Founder-led enforcement expertise backed by executive leadership and specialist teams in Seller Central.
Founder, ASA Compliance Group · International speaker on Amazon enforcement and reinstatement
When your Amazon account or listings are suspended, every moment counts, and genuine expertise matters. Or Shamosh, founder of ASA Compliance Group, has spent over 10 years mastering the complexities of Amazon’s policies, compliance guidelines, and seller reinstatements. His LL.B. background informs how he reads Performance Notifications and frames compliance strategy; complex matters still run through ASA Compliance Group’s in-house legal department and outside counsel when required. He has led work across 5,500+ cases. His work spans seller account suspensions, listing appeals and compliance cases.
Or regularly shares his knowledge at seller conferences and webinars worldwide, including Prague March 2025, Sofia April 2025 and April 2026, Warsaw May 2026, with an upcoming UK appearance in October 2026. See conference appearances, explore seller webinars, read the restricted keywords guide, or see client stories in Testimonials.
AmazonSellersAppeal is operated by ASA Compliance Group, with dedicated appeal, legal, IP, and compliance teams in Seller Central. Michael Gourin and Smadar Popovski, alongside Or, lead intake and case operations; specialist staff join when your Performance Notification requires it.
Or Shamosh · Founder & CEO
Chief Commercial Officer
Product, marketing, partner channels, case intake & service structure
Owns product positioning, marketing, partner channels, and intake so sellers enter the right service path with clear scope and the right facts.
Chief Operating Officer
Appeal execution, Seller Central operations & case sequencing
Runs Performance Notification review, POA execution, Seller Central follow-ups, and escalations with disciplined sequencing.
Ready to reinstate your account with confidence? Get my case strategy
These cases can originate in supplier revisions, shared-catalog changes, seller mapping or fulfilment. The order, unit and historical page evidence decide which.
The manufacturer revised the product and the record still describes the previous one, or the reverse. Sellers often learn about the revision from the complaint rather than from the supplier.
Obtain the manufacturer's change notice and compare identifiers, specifications, dimensions, formulation, compatibility, accessories, warranty and packaging. Then decide whether it is the same product revised, or a distinct model that needs its own record. Amazon's version mismatch guidance sets out how it reads a version, model, language or edition difference.
A two-pack fulfilling a single-unit record, or a bundle whose composition changed. Quantity is one of the differences customers notice immediately and complain about precisely, which is why it surfaces fast.
Genuine inventory produced for another market. The goods are authentic, and that is not the question. Voltage, plug type, language, warranty terms, regulatory marks, formulation and included components can all differ while the product remains genuine.
Where the complaint is really about territorial distribution or material differences asserted by a rights owner, the issue is parallel import violations, which turns on different evidence.
The item looks the same and is not. An ingredient list changes, a cable is no longer in the box, a material is substituted. These are the hardest for a seller to notice, because nothing about the receiving process flags them.
A packaging change is not automatically immaterial. Whether it matters depends on what changed inside it, not on how different the box looks.
The most purely administrative version, and common after a catalog edit. The code was attached to a record that has since been changed by another contributor, so the mapping was correct when it was made and is not now.
This is where the page at order time matters more than the page today, and where the incorrect detail page lane may be the actual remedy if the record rather than the inventory is what moved.
AmazonSellersAppeal by Or Shamosh reviews your different item complaint notice and evidence, then manages your case in Seller Central.
We review the complaint and compare the delivered product with the ASIN and listing as they appeared when the order was placed.
We check product versions, identifiers and packaging, then prepare the catalog corrections or evidence that explains the mismatch.
We manage the Seller Central response, verify relevant listing changes and handle additional requests, revisions and follow-ups.
Strategy, evidence, appeal writing, submissions and unlimited follow-ups and revisions within the agreed case scope.
Amazon seller enforcement is our daily work. Amazon Sellers Appeal has handled account, listing and compliance cases across global marketplaces.
* Historical results across ASA Compliance Group-managed enforcement cases. Last verified as of .
Real names and quotes from clients we’ve helped through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.
Other firms failed
“One of the greatest messages an Amazon seller can receive! I tried 2 other firms that both failed miserably and wasted about 5-6 weeks. Or fixed it in < 48hrs.”
Suspended 6 weeks, then deactivated
“My account had been suspended for more than 6 weeks with 4 failed attempts. Then it was completely deactivated. I hired Or Shamosh and within 3 days it was reactivated. Add me to that recommendation list.”
Reactivated in 24 hours
“Or was the only one who offered a solution to resolve everything without removing all the products from Amazon warehouses. In less than 24 hours after the appeal, my account was reactivated with all products available for sale.”
Account suspended
“My Amazon seller account was suspended and then a miracle. I paid Mr Or Shamosh who got me back on, so quick only 5 days later I was back!! I highly recommend him. He is brilliant, honest and genuine.”
Pesticide listing
“HUGE shoutout to Or Shamosh for his help with my PESTICIDE suspension. I fought them myself for a month with no results. Reached out on Friday. My listings were live again earlier TODAY. LESS THAN A DAY!”
Listing complaints
“Shout out to Or Shamosh for helping me get one of my listings back online after it got taken down due to customer complaints! Thanks buddy.”
Hijacker removed
“I had a hijacker who really didn't want to leave. When Or sent me his organized method and we acted together, he dropped off my listing after a week and a half. I highly recommend him.”
Product reinstated
“After a month of ongoing work, the product was finally reinstated. Or was available at any moment, a precise professional, and courteous.”
Hijacker resolved
“A hijacker lowered my price by 40%. I turned to Or Shamosh who guided me through this process. Another week went by and the issue was resolved. Amazing service, patience, and he was available at all times.”
Listing policy
“A magician! I highly recommend Or for anyone who needs help with Amazon policy and listing reinstatement. He is patient, attentive, meticulous, and most importantly, professional and fast!”
Patent dispute
“A competitor wrongly accused me of patent infringement. Or Shamosh helped me fix this problem very quickly and professionally! I'm more than happy with his service and communication.”
“Shamosh is a true professional and WIZARD! Very kind, super responsive, and extra helpful. He literally saved my business! God bless you both.”
Patent infringement
“My listing was reported for PATENT infringement. Within 3 working days my listing was back online. Even after reinstatement, I had relisting issues. He sent another appeal and within 1 hour it was all back online.”
Account review
“Amazon notified me my account was under review. I immediately contacted Or Shamosh, who worked tirelessly all week. Within a short time, my account was reinstated. If you encounter issues, know you have a professional on your side.”
Trademark claim
“A competitor filed a false Trademark claim. I had a thorough, well-written appeal the next day. My appeal was accepted and within a few days my listings were back up and live. I am beyond grateful.”
Patent complaint
“Or Shamosh is AMAZING. Thank you my friend for helping me to reinstate my listings. He did an awesome job for appealing my patent complaint. You're the MAN.”
Adult flag
“Amazon incorrectly placed an 'Adult' flag on my listing. I fired off the emails in the morning and just half hour later got a reply from Amazon saying they have lifted the flag!!!! I'm beyond happy.”
Account reinstated
“Thanks so much to Or Shamosh for reinstating my account!! You have done an amazing job and were able to get me selling again in no time! Definitely recommend his services!”
Pesticide tag
“I'd been struggling for about two months due to an incorrect pesticide tag. After almost 10 weeks of trying myself, Or helped me get the listing reinstated in less than a week. Without his help, I'm not sure if I'd ever have solved it.”
Six short videos from sellers who worked with ASA Compliance Group through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.
6 client video stories
When you’re ready, get your case strategy below. We’ll tell you if we’re the right fit.
ASA Compliance Group operates Amazon Sellers Appeal. On different-item files we compare the unit with the record, reconstruct the page history, and realign both in Seller Central.
This finding means the item customers received materially differs from the product on the detail page, even where the seller shipped exactly the internal code they intended. The order, the physical unit, the fulfilment records and the historical detail page then determine whether the cause is mapping, version or fulfilment. None of those is assumed at the outset.
The difference decides the whole investigation, so it is worth settling before anything else. A catalog answer sent to a proven pick error reads as evasion, and a fulfilment audit sent to a mapping problem finds nothing wrong because nothing in the warehouse was.
The differences that count are the ones a customer would notice: model or generation, size, colour, pack count, region, voltage, language, formulation, included accessories, packaging version, or a manufacturer revision.
Those group into three origins, and the origin decides who can fix it:
A revised model, a new formulation, a different case quantity, a component dropped from the box. Usually discovered from the complaint rather than a notice.
Genuine goods, produced to different expectations: voltage, plug, language, warranty, regulatory marks, regional formulation.
The product stayed the same and the page it is attached to changed, so a mapping that was correct when it was made is not now.
Amazon's product detail page rules carry the principle underneath all three, that one record describes one product.
Reviewers are comparing a physical unit with a record. Most rejected responses prove the warehouse worked instead.
Proof that the intended code shipped, with nothing about whether that code was mapped to the right record.
A change dismissed as packaging when it affects compatibility, warranty, region, ingredients, quantity or instructions.
The record is updated while the historical units and the orders that produced the complaints go unaddressed.
Another contributor is named, with no contribution history and no physical-product evidence behind the claim.
Two genuinely different products consolidated onto one record to simplify the fix, which creates the next complaint.
A single product image offered as identity proof, with no identifiers, specifications or side-by-side comparison.
A focused appeal connects your notice with verifiable records. Here is what we review: product identity, ASIN mapping, packaging and historical listing content.
Record the exact complaint, the record and code, the affected orders, the fulfilment channel and the stated difference. Then answer the threshold question in writing: is this a mapping problem or a pick problem? Amazon does not label the two, so the branch is settled from the notice, the order, the physical unit and the detail page as it stood at the time, not from which phrase the notice used. The rest of the file depends on it, and it is answered from the order records rather than from impression.
Where returns exist, the returned unit is the single most useful piece of evidence in the case, because it is the actual object the customer received rather than a description of it.
Put the physical unit and the record side by side and mark each field identical or different, with photographs and manufacturer specifications behind it:
The output is a statement of which physical unit belongs on which record and why, rather than an argument that the two are close enough.
A screenshot of the record today does not show what customers saw when the affected orders were placed, and on a case caused by a catalog edit that gap is the whole defence. Category Listings Reports, contribution history, dated captures and support cases are what reconstruct it.
This evidence is also perishable in practice. It gets harder to assemble the longer the case runs, which is an argument for pulling it early even if the response is weeks away.
Each version in stock needs a decision: remap to the correct record, segregate, relabel, remove, or restrict from sale. Where the versions are genuinely different products, one of them usually needs its own record, which is an ASIN creation question rather than a merge.
Then the states, four of them and not interchangeable: prepared, uploaded, processed and live-verified. Physical work has its own version of this: relabelled and segregated are claims until they are dated and evidenced.
If the returned unit is available, say so. It usually settles in one photograph what a page of argument cannot.
For sellers who already have the Performance Notification. Broader questions: full FAQ library.
Your case stays with one team for the evidence review, appeal, submissions and follow-ups.
Include the affected orders, the stated difference, and photographs of the unit and packaging beside the listing. Four short steps. Or Shamosh reads every intake.
Or Shamosh · Founder and lead strategist
5,500+ enforcement cases since 2016. Every intake is personally assessed before acceptance.
Send what you have, including prior DIY or agency appeals. We say what is viable in writing before you commit.
Questionnaire
If the questionnaire does not load, open intake on the account page.
If Amazon says customers received a different item, start with the questionnaire.
For individual ASIN issues, explore listing reinstatement. For a different notice, browse all suspension types.
