A design patent complaint has taken your Amazon listing offline? We review the patent, product images and complaint history, then coordinate the legal analysis and handle the Amazon response.
Founder-led review. Most first replies within about an hour.
Last verified as of .
Founder-led enforcement expertise backed by executive leadership and specialist teams in Seller Central.
Founder, ASA Compliance Group · International speaker on Amazon enforcement and reinstatement
When your Amazon account or listings are suspended, every moment counts, and genuine expertise matters. Or Shamosh, founder of ASA Compliance Group, has spent over 10 years mastering the complexities of Amazon’s policies, compliance guidelines, and seller reinstatements. His LL.B. background informs how he reads Performance Notifications and frames compliance strategy; complex matters still run through ASA Compliance Group’s in-house legal department and outside counsel when required. He has led work across 5,500+ cases. His work spans seller account suspensions, listing appeals and compliance cases.
Or regularly shares his knowledge at seller conferences and webinars worldwide, including Prague March 2025, Sofia April 2025 and April 2026, Warsaw May 2026, with an upcoming UK appearance in October 2026. See conference appearances, explore seller webinars, read the restricted keywords guide, or see client stories in Testimonials.
AmazonSellersAppeal is operated by ASA Compliance Group, with dedicated appeal, legal, IP, and compliance teams in Seller Central. Michael Gourin and Smadar Popovski, alongside Or, lead intake and case operations; specialist staff join when your Performance Notification requires it.
Or Shamosh · Founder & CEO
Chief Commercial Officer
Product, marketing, partner channels, case intake & service structure
Owns product positioning, marketing, partner channels, and intake so sellers enter the right service path with clear scope and the right facts.
Chief Operating Officer
Appeal execution, Seller Central operations & case sequencing
Runs Performance Notification review, POA execution, Seller Central follow-ups, and escalations with disciplined sequencing.
Ready to reinstate your account with confidence? Get my case strategy
The design is rarely copied deliberately. Most of these begin somewhere in the supply chain or in a genuine similarity.
The patent holder or its agent files against the listing. Sometimes across several listings at once under one asserted patent. The unit of work is the complaint identifier rather than the ASIN, because one complaint can name several listings, and one position has to hold across all of them.
Two products in a category converge on a similar shape because the function constrains it. Genuine similarity, no copying, and still capable of supporting a complaint depending on what the drawings actually claim.
This is where the structured comparison earns its place. An impression that they look different is not evidence. Working through the drawings feature by feature organises the factual analysis, and it is not the governing test: infringement is decided on the overall impression to the ordinary observer, so a list of individual differences does not settle it.
The factory offers the design to everyone, and several sellers list it. Buying it in good faith does not resolve whether the design falls within someone's claim, and supplier assurances are worth what the supplier's own position is worth.
A licence or authorization letter exists and Amazon rejects it. Usually the failure is in authority and authentication rather than in the appeal's wording: the named owner, the assignment chain, the dates, the signatories and the document presentation do not reconcile.
Trace the chain to the recorded owner in the official register. Where an intermediary granted it, their own right to do so has to be shown too.
Similar designs available before the patent's effective filing or priority date - not its issue date, which is usually later and is the wrong line to measure from. Prior art also frames the infringement comparison itself, because the ordinary observer is presumed familiar with it. It is still a different argument from saying the product does not infringe, and the two should be kept apart rather than blended.
Prior art and non-infringement answer different questions and carry different risks. Mixing them casually weakens both, and either belongs with counsel before it is asserted.
AmazonSellersAppeal by Or Shamosh reviews your design patent complaint notice and evidence, then manages your case in Seller Central.
We review the complaint, affected ASINs and patent record, then compare the product with the patent drawings.
We organize product photographs, the comparison and supporting records, and coordinate qualified legal review where the response requires it.
We manage the appropriate Seller Central response and any complaint-retraction process, then handle replies, revisions and follow-ups.
Strategy, evidence, appeal writing, submissions and unlimited follow-ups and revisions within the agreed case scope.
Amazon seller enforcement is our daily work. Amazon Sellers Appeal has handled account, listing and compliance cases across global marketplaces.
* Historical results across ASA Compliance Group-managed enforcement cases. Last verified as of .
Real names and quotes from clients we’ve helped through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.
Other firms failed
“One of the greatest messages an Amazon seller can receive! I tried 2 other firms that both failed miserably and wasted about 5-6 weeks. Or fixed it in < 48hrs.”
Suspended 6 weeks, then deactivated
“My account had been suspended for more than 6 weeks with 4 failed attempts. Then it was completely deactivated. I hired Or Shamosh and within 3 days it was reactivated. Add me to that recommendation list.”
Reactivated in 24 hours
“Or was the only one who offered a solution to resolve everything without removing all the products from Amazon warehouses. In less than 24 hours after the appeal, my account was reactivated with all products available for sale.”
Account suspended
“My Amazon seller account was suspended and then a miracle. I paid Mr Or Shamosh who got me back on, so quick only 5 days later I was back!! I highly recommend him. He is brilliant, honest and genuine.”
Pesticide listing
“HUGE shoutout to Or Shamosh for his help with my PESTICIDE suspension. I fought them myself for a month with no results. Reached out on Friday. My listings were live again earlier TODAY. LESS THAN A DAY!”
Listing complaints
“Shout out to Or Shamosh for helping me get one of my listings back online after it got taken down due to customer complaints! Thanks buddy.”
Hijacker removed
“I had a hijacker who really didn't want to leave. When Or sent me his organized method and we acted together, he dropped off my listing after a week and a half. I highly recommend him.”
Product reinstated
“After a month of ongoing work, the product was finally reinstated. Or was available at any moment, a precise professional, and courteous.”
Hijacker resolved
“A hijacker lowered my price by 40%. I turned to Or Shamosh who guided me through this process. Another week went by and the issue was resolved. Amazing service, patience, and he was available at all times.”
Listing policy
“A magician! I highly recommend Or for anyone who needs help with Amazon policy and listing reinstatement. He is patient, attentive, meticulous, and most importantly, professional and fast!”
Patent dispute
“A competitor wrongly accused me of patent infringement. Or Shamosh helped me fix this problem very quickly and professionally! I'm more than happy with his service and communication.”
“Shamosh is a true professional and WIZARD! Very kind, super responsive, and extra helpful. He literally saved my business! God bless you both.”
Patent infringement
“My listing was reported for PATENT infringement. Within 3 working days my listing was back online. Even after reinstatement, I had relisting issues. He sent another appeal and within 1 hour it was all back online.”
Account review
“Amazon notified me my account was under review. I immediately contacted Or Shamosh, who worked tirelessly all week. Within a short time, my account was reinstated. If you encounter issues, know you have a professional on your side.”
Trademark claim
“A competitor filed a false Trademark claim. I had a thorough, well-written appeal the next day. My appeal was accepted and within a few days my listings were back up and live. I am beyond grateful.”
Patent complaint
“Or Shamosh is AMAZING. Thank you my friend for helping me to reinstate my listings. He did an awesome job for appealing my patent complaint. You're the MAN.”
Adult flag
“Amazon incorrectly placed an 'Adult' flag on my listing. I fired off the emails in the morning and just half hour later got a reply from Amazon saying they have lifted the flag!!!! I'm beyond happy.”
Account reinstated
“Thanks so much to Or Shamosh for reinstating my account!! You have done an amazing job and were able to get me selling again in no time! Definitely recommend his services!”
Pesticide tag
“I'd been struggling for about two months due to an incorrect pesticide tag. After almost 10 weeks of trying myself, Or helped me get the listing reinstated in less than a week. Without his help, I'm not sure if I'd ever have solved it.”
Six short videos from sellers who worked with ASA Compliance Group through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.
6 client video stories
When you’re ready, get your case strategy below. We’ll tell you if we’re the right fit.
ASA Compliance Group operates Amazon Sellers Appeal. On design-patent files we assemble the record and run the Seller Central route. We coordinate qualified legal review when the response requires it.
A design patent protects the ornamental appearance of an article rather than how it works. So the allegation is about how the product looks, and arguments about function, quality or materials do not reach it. The notice normally identifies a complaint identifier, the asserted patent, the rights owner or its agent, and the affected listing.
Two products looking broadly similar is not the test, and neither is their being non-identical. The governing test is the ordinary-observer test: whether an ordinary observer, familiar with the prior art, would be deceived into believing the accused product is the same as the claimed design. The comparison is between the claimed design as shown in the patent drawings and the accused product, and it is more structured than an impression.
A design patent is not a trademark, and the two carry different tests and different evidence. Where the complaint is about a brand name or logo rather than the shape of the article, it is trademark infringement.
Three routes, and the evidence decides which:
The rights owner withdraws the complaint. Every complaint identifier needs its own withdrawal.
The design differs, the patent does not apply, the product is licensed, or the complaint has a documented defect.
The seller accepts the listing should not continue. An honest outcome, and sometimes the right one.
Amazon's patent policy for sellers covers the process side. Everything about claim scope, validity, ownership, expiry and infringement is legal analysis: this page organises the facts, and qualified patent counsel draws the conclusions.
Reviewers are looking for an organised record. Most rejected responses offer an assertion about appearance.
The products differ, argued without a consistent-angle comparison against the patent drawings themselves.
Invoices, trademark records or supplier assurances sent against a question about ornamental design. They do not reach it.
Validity, ownership, expiry or priority treated as settled without checking the official record and the jurisdiction.
A message sent before the product, patent and objective are assessed, which can create admissions or invite a demand.
A plan of action that implicitly admits infringement when the seller's position is that the complaint is wrong.
A comparison that omits unfavourable views. Reviewers notice the missing angle, and it costs more credibility than the view would have.
A focused appeal connects your notice with verifiable records. Here is what we review: the patent record, product comparison and complaint response.
Record the notice, the complaint identifier, the listing, the asserted patent number, the rights owner's identity, the marketplace and the complaint status. Where several listings were removed under one patent, record which complaint identifier each removal cites. One complaint can cover several ASINs and one patent can be asserted in several complaints, so the identifiers and the listings do not map one to one, and the grouping decides what has to be answered separately.
Then pull the official patent record: the drawings, the status, the ownership and assignments, the filing and issue information, and the jurisdiction. Every one of those is checkable and none of them should be assumed from the complaint. If the complaint also alleges the goods are not genuine, that is a separate allegation with its own evidence: see counterfeit claims.
This is the core of the file and it is a structured document rather than a pair of photographs:
Omitting an angle is worse than including one that does not help. A comparison that is visibly selective invites the reader to discount all of it, and the missing view is usually the one that gets requested.
Assembling the notice, the product, the patent record and the comparison is operational work and it should start immediately, because evidence degrades. Turning those into a conclusion is not. Claim scope, infringement, validity, ownership, expiry, jurisdiction, licensing and litigation risk all need qualified patent counsel.
Do not wait for counsel before preserving evidence, and do not publish a conclusion before counsel has reviewed it. Those two together are the whole rule, and they are not in tension.
Where a commercial resolution is available, document it for every complaint identifier separately. A retraction has to be filed through Amazon's channel by the rights owner: an agreement to retract, a supplier's assurance or a lawyer's letter saying it will happen is not the completed event.
A withdrawn complaint removes that complaint. It does not resolve unrelated listings, other complaints, or account-level issues that may remain open alongside it, and a rights owner objecting to the market the goods were made for is a parallel import matter rather than a design one.
Closing or withdrawing the offer stops further sales, and that is sometimes the right commercial decision while the matter is open. It does not by itself clear an existing complaint or the Account Health violation attached to it. Complaint resolution, retraction and listing closure are three separate events, and only the first two change what is recorded against the account.
If you have already contacted the complainant, include the correspondence. It affects what is still available and it cannot be unsent.
For sellers who already have the Performance Notification. Broader questions: full FAQ library.
Your case stays with one team for the evidence review, appeal, submissions and follow-ups.
Include the complaint identifier, the patent asserted, and photographs of your product from every angle. Four short steps. Or Shamosh reads every intake.
Or Shamosh · Founder and lead strategist
5,500+ enforcement cases since 2016. Every intake is personally assessed before acceptance.
Send what you have, including prior DIY or agency appeals. We say what is viable in writing before you commit.
Questionnaire
If the questionnaire does not load, open intake on the account page.
If Amazon removed a listing over a design patent complaint, start with the questionnaire.
For individual ASIN issues, explore listing reinstatement. For a different notice, browse all suspension types.
