Amazon flagged brand misuse on your listing? We check the brand field, listing content and complaint, then handle the correction and appeal for the issue Amazon raised.
Founder-led review. Most first replies within about an hour.
Last verified as of .
Founder-led enforcement expertise backed by executive leadership and specialist teams in Seller Central.
Founder, ASA Compliance Group · International speaker on Amazon enforcement and reinstatement
When your Amazon account or listings are suspended, every moment counts, and genuine expertise matters. Or Shamosh, founder of ASA Compliance Group, has spent over 10 years mastering the complexities of Amazon’s policies, compliance guidelines, and seller reinstatements. His LL.B. background informs how he reads Performance Notifications and frames compliance strategy; complex matters still run through ASA Compliance Group’s in-house legal department and outside counsel when required. He has led work across 5,500+ cases. His work spans seller account suspensions, listing appeals and compliance cases.
Or regularly shares his knowledge at seller conferences and webinars worldwide, including Prague March 2025, Sofia April 2025 and April 2026, Warsaw May 2026, with an upcoming UK appearance in October 2026. See conference appearances, explore seller webinars, read the restricted keywords guide, or see client stories in Testimonials.
AmazonSellersAppeal is operated by ASA Compliance Group, with dedicated appeal, legal, IP, and compliance teams in Seller Central. Michael Gourin and Smadar Popovski, alongside Or, lead intake and case operations; specialist staff join when your Performance Notification requires it.
Or Shamosh · Founder & CEO
Chief Commercial Officer
Product, marketing, partner channels, case intake & service structure
Owns product positioning, marketing, partner channels, and intake so sellers enter the right service path with clear scope and the right facts.
Chief Operating Officer
Appeal execution, Seller Central operations & case sequencing
Runs Performance Notification review, POA execution, Seller Central follow-ups, and escalations with disciplined sequencing.
Ready to reinstate your account with confidence? Get my case strategy
Each of these is a different catalog act with different evidence behind it. The notice rarely distinguishes them, so the response has to.
An established ASIN's brand attribute was edited. The seller may have done it, or a feed, a vendor, or another contributor. Amazon restricts changes to this attribute precisely because it is the field that decides what a record is.
The contribution history separates the cases and the storefront does not show it. Pull it before arguing about who is responsible, because the answer changes the route rather than the burden.
Another brand's name appears somewhere on the record with no defensible descriptive basis. The brand field itself is often correct here, which is why sellers are surprised by the notice.
Accurate compatibility language is generally permitted. What is being tested is placement and overall impression, not whether the word appears.
Either a branded product sits on a generic record, or a generic product has been assigned a brand. Both are identity mismatches, and where the dispute is really about the unit rather than the catalog entry, it belongs on misbranded product violations instead.
The move that reliably makes it worse is editing an established generic ASIN into a branded one. A genuinely branded product usually needs a correctly created record, which is an ASIN creation question.
The brand is claimed but not permanently affixed to the goods. Amazon's wording here is specific and worth reading literally: it asks for evidence that the product is permanently branded, not evidence that the brand exists.
The catalog names one party as the source and the product names another. This is usually a documentation gap rather than a dispute: the relationship is real but has never been written down in a form a reviewer can follow.
Write the chain out explicitly, from manufacturer to seller to brand to identifier to ASIN, with a document at each link. Every one of them should point at the same product.
AmazonSellersAppeal by Or Shamosh reviews your brand misuse notice and evidence, then manages your case in Seller Central.
We review the notice and product photographs to identify whether Amazon is questioning the brand field, authorization or use of a trademark.
We check the product branding and supporting records, then prepare the relevant catalog correction, authorization evidence or dispute.
We manage the Seller Central response, verify relevant listing changes and handle further document requests, revisions and follow-ups.
Strategy, evidence, appeal writing, submissions and unlimited follow-ups and revisions within the agreed case scope.
Amazon seller enforcement is our daily work. Amazon Sellers Appeal has handled account, listing and compliance cases across global marketplaces.
* Historical results across ASA Compliance Group-managed enforcement cases. Last verified as of .
Real names and quotes from clients we’ve helped through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.
Other firms failed
“One of the greatest messages an Amazon seller can receive! I tried 2 other firms that both failed miserably and wasted about 5-6 weeks. Or fixed it in < 48hrs.”
Suspended 6 weeks, then deactivated
“My account had been suspended for more than 6 weeks with 4 failed attempts. Then it was completely deactivated. I hired Or Shamosh and within 3 days it was reactivated. Add me to that recommendation list.”
Reactivated in 24 hours
“Or was the only one who offered a solution to resolve everything without removing all the products from Amazon warehouses. In less than 24 hours after the appeal, my account was reactivated with all products available for sale.”
Account suspended
“My Amazon seller account was suspended and then a miracle. I paid Mr Or Shamosh who got me back on, so quick only 5 days later I was back!! I highly recommend him. He is brilliant, honest and genuine.”
Pesticide listing
“HUGE shoutout to Or Shamosh for his help with my PESTICIDE suspension. I fought them myself for a month with no results. Reached out on Friday. My listings were live again earlier TODAY. LESS THAN A DAY!”
Listing complaints
“Shout out to Or Shamosh for helping me get one of my listings back online after it got taken down due to customer complaints! Thanks buddy.”
Hijacker removed
“I had a hijacker who really didn't want to leave. When Or sent me his organized method and we acted together, he dropped off my listing after a week and a half. I highly recommend him.”
Product reinstated
“After a month of ongoing work, the product was finally reinstated. Or was available at any moment, a precise professional, and courteous.”
Hijacker resolved
“A hijacker lowered my price by 40%. I turned to Or Shamosh who guided me through this process. Another week went by and the issue was resolved. Amazing service, patience, and he was available at all times.”
Listing policy
“A magician! I highly recommend Or for anyone who needs help with Amazon policy and listing reinstatement. He is patient, attentive, meticulous, and most importantly, professional and fast!”
Patent dispute
“A competitor wrongly accused me of patent infringement. Or Shamosh helped me fix this problem very quickly and professionally! I'm more than happy with his service and communication.”
“Shamosh is a true professional and WIZARD! Very kind, super responsive, and extra helpful. He literally saved my business! God bless you both.”
Patent infringement
“My listing was reported for PATENT infringement. Within 3 working days my listing was back online. Even after reinstatement, I had relisting issues. He sent another appeal and within 1 hour it was all back online.”
Account review
“Amazon notified me my account was under review. I immediately contacted Or Shamosh, who worked tirelessly all week. Within a short time, my account was reinstated. If you encounter issues, know you have a professional on your side.”
Trademark claim
“A competitor filed a false Trademark claim. I had a thorough, well-written appeal the next day. My appeal was accepted and within a few days my listings were back up and live. I am beyond grateful.”
Patent complaint
“Or Shamosh is AMAZING. Thank you my friend for helping me to reinstate my listings. He did an awesome job for appealing my patent complaint. You're the MAN.”
Adult flag
“Amazon incorrectly placed an 'Adult' flag on my listing. I fired off the emails in the morning and just half hour later got a reply from Amazon saying they have lifted the flag!!!! I'm beyond happy.”
Account reinstated
“Thanks so much to Or Shamosh for reinstating my account!! You have done an amazing job and were able to get me selling again in no time! Definitely recommend his services!”
Pesticide tag
“I'd been struggling for about two months due to an incorrect pesticide tag. After almost 10 weeks of trying myself, Or helped me get the listing reinstated in less than a week. Without his help, I'm not sure if I'd ever have solved it.”
Six short videos from sellers who worked with ASA Compliance Group through reinstatement. Every case has its own timeline and details.
6 client video stories
When you’re ready, get your case strategy below. We’ll tell you if we’re the right fit.
ASA Compliance Group operates Amazon Sellers Appeal. On brand-misuse files we identify the notice route, then either correct the surfaces that are wrong or present the evidence that defends the brand as it stands.
Brand misuse arrives by several different routes, and the route decides the response. Sellers reach this page from notices that read similarly and are not the same event at all. Read which one you received before deciding what to send, because a correction filed against a rights-owner complaint does not reach the party who can withdraw it.
The remainder of this section works through the brand-field and generic-product branch, which is the most common of the five and the one where the catalog evidence decides the outcome. If your notice names a rights owner, the trademark complaint route is the one to read, because retraction and dispute are handled there.
On that branch the contested act is usually one of a short list. Changing the brand attribute on an existing ASIN. Using another brand's name to attract traffic. Listing a branded product as generic. Assigning a private-label brand to goods that do not carry it. Or creating content that misrepresents the manufacturer or a compatibility relationship.
Three questions decide the route, in this order:
What brand is permanently affixed to the product and its packaging? This is the source of truth everything else is measured against.
Where does the catalog carry a brand? Brand field, title, bullets, images, A plus content, and the backend search terms nobody checks.
Who submitted the contested value, and does the seller control it, or merely have an offer attached to it?
Two boundaries worth stating early, because both are common assumptions and both are wrong. Amazon's generic product policy limits repurposing a generic record into a branded one, so editing the brand field is not a route to a branded page. And Brand Registry enrolment is access, not permission: it does not by itself authorise changing an established ASIN's brand identity.
Reviewers are looking for the authoritative brand and a corrected catalog. Most rejected responses supply ownership documents and leave the catalog as it was.
A trademark record is provided while the physical product does not display the brand being claimed. Those are different questions.
The brand field is fixed and the title, images, A plus content and backend search terms still carry the old value.
Another contributor is named, with no contribution history and no account of the seller's own offer against the ASIN.
Brand keywords remain in the backend terms while the response argues about the visible listing.
The brand field is changed again mid-review, outside the proper catalog or Brand Registry route, which reads as a second unauthorized act.
A general brand statement restated under several headings, never naming the specific catalog act Amazon contested.
A focused appeal connects your notice with verifiable records. Here is what we review: product branding, brand-field accuracy and authorization records.
Record the exact violation, the ASIN, the contested brand attribute, the marketplace, and both the current and historical listing content. Then name which of the catalog acts is actually at issue, because the evidence differs completely between a brand-field change and a competitor keyword.
Photograph the product and its packaging on every side, showing the brand as permanently affixed, along with the manufacturer, model and identifiers. This is the source of truth the rest of the file is measured against.
A brand can be wrong in more places than the brand field, and a correction that misses one is not a correction. Check each of these and record the current value against the target value:
The backend terms are the surface most often forgotten, and on a competitor-keyword case they are usually the whole allegation.
Where the seller is asserting the brand, the file needs the relationship rather than the registration alone: manufacturing or private-label agreement, brand ownership or authorization, the GS1 record, and invoices that name the same brand, model and identifiers.
Each document should point at the same product. A trademark proves a mark exists and who holds it. It does not prove the units in the fulfilment centre carry that mark, and that is the gap Amazon is usually testing.
Catalog work runs through prepared, uploaded, processed and live-verified. An accepted processing row is not a live page, and a live title is not a corrected backend. Report each surface in the state it is genuinely in. The same four states govern any detail page correction.
Where the mismatch is with the physical unit rather than the record, the issue is misbranded product violations. Where a protected mark is being asserted by its owner, it is trademark infringement, which has its own routes and its own evidence.
If a link in the chain does not exist, say so. A stated gap can be worked with; an authorization letter written for the occasion cannot be withdrawn from the case log.
For sellers who already have the Performance Notification. Broader questions: full FAQ library.
Your case stays with one team for the evidence review, appeal, submissions and follow-ups.
Include the brand value Amazon contests, photographs showing the branding on the unit, and any ownership or manufacturing paperwork. Four short steps. Or Shamosh reads every intake.
Or Shamosh · Founder and lead strategist
5,500+ enforcement cases since 2016. Every intake is personally assessed before acceptance.
Send what you have, including prior DIY or agency appeals. We say what is viable in writing before you commit.
Questionnaire
If the questionnaire does not load, open intake on the account page.
If Amazon flagged brand misuse or locked the brand field, start with the questionnaire.
For individual ASIN issues, explore listing reinstatement. For a different notice, browse all suspension types.
