Amazon Code of Conduct Violation: Attempting to Damage or Abuse Another Seller

Amazon’s “Attempting to Damage or Abuse Another Seller” Violation: What It Means and How to Avoid It

If you’ve recently received a notice under Selling Policies and Seller Code of Conduct (attempting to damage or abuse another seller), you’re not alone.

Amazon has dramatically increased enforcement in 2025, flagging sellers not just for black-hat tactics, but for ordinary activities that seem harmless – like testing a competitor’s product, leaving what you thought was an “honest” review, or even just clicking “helpful” or “not helpful” on competitor reviews.

The common thread? Amazon’s demand that all sellers must always “act fairly.”

In this article, you’ll learn:

What this violation actually means.
The honest mistakes that can still get you flagged.
The obvious infringements Amazon designed this policy to stop.
Why your buyer account often gets banned at the same time.
A practical, step-by-step playbook for safe competitor research.
How to appeal if you’ve already been flagged.

What Does “Attempting to Damage or Abuse Another Seller” Mean?

Amazon’s Code of Conduct includes one broad but powerful principle:

👉 Sellers must always “act fairly.”

Under this umbrella, Amazon prohibits:

Manipulating reviews or ratings.
Voting “helpful” on negative reviews or “unhelpful” on positive reviews of competitor listings.
Misusing Q&A, reporting tools, or buyer-seller messaging to disadvantage others.
Any attempt to damage or abuse another seller’s reputation or performance.

This language is intentionally broad. It allows Amazon to act on both blatant manipulation and subtle “grey area” actions that distort the customer experience.

Honest Activities That Still Get Flagged

Here are real examples of behaviors many sellers think are harmless – but Amazon interprets as violations:

Buying a competitor’s product for research
Looks normal to you; to Amazon, it looks like conflict of interest if the account is linked to your seller profile.
Refunding after testing a competitor’s product
Refunds combined with review activity are seen as manipulation – even if the intent was honest market research.
Leaving an “honest” negative review
Amazon doesn’t measure honesty. Any negative review from a competitor-linked account is treated as an attempt to damage.
Voting “helpful” on a negative review of a competitor
Amazon considers this a way of amplifying harm against competitors.
Voting “unhelpful” on a positive review of a competitor
This is treated as suppressing competitor credibility – even if you just thought the review looked fake.
Communicating with competitor sellers
Asking questions through Buyer-Seller Messaging can be misinterpreted as intimidation or interference.

And note: Amazon’s enforcement is not limited to recent activity. Even competitor orders or review-related actions made years ago can trigger this violation today, because Amazon’s systems are now back-checking historical buyer and seller activity under stricter rules.

Obvious Infringements Amazon Designed This Rule to Stop

On the other end of the spectrum, here are clear black-hat violations that Amazon aggressively pursues:

Agencies or VAs running mass review-voting campaigns.
Fake buyer accounts created solely for negative reviews.
Friends, family, or employees reviewing competitor products.
Incentivized review schemes (rebate clubs, free products for reviews).
Misusing Q&A to plant misleading or harmful questions on competitor listings.
Bulk “report abuse” campaigns to suppress competitor reviews.
Unauthorized account access to post reviews or votes.

These are near-guaranteed violations of “acting fairly” and usually lead to suspension if discovered.

Golden Rule of Competitor Research

If you buy a competitor’s product:

Never refund it. Never review it. Never vote on its reviews. Never contact the seller.

Just buy it, study it quietly, and keep the insights internal. That’s the only way to gain value from competitor testing without risking a “Seller Code of Conduct (attempting to damage or abuse another seller)” violation.

Safe vs. Risky vs. Prohibited Activities

Category	Examples	Risk Level
✅ Safe	Buying a competitor product (no refund, no review, no votes, no communication).	Low
⚠️ Risky	Buying and refunding; purchasing multiple competitor ASINs in short succession; testing and documenting but on a buyer account linked to your seller account.	Medium
❌ Prohibited	Leaving reviews (positive or negative) on competitor listings; voting “helpful” on negative reviews or “unhelpful” on positive reviews; incentivizing reviews; running VA vote campaigns; misusing Q&A or report abuse.	Very High

Why Buyer Accounts Get Banned Too

Amazon often disables your buyer account’s community privileges when issuing this violation. That’s because:

Accounts are linked by IP addresses, Wi-Fi networks, cards, or devices.
Amazon assumes buyer actions (reviews, votes, refunds) are part of your selling strategy.
Even relatives or employees with separate accounts can get banned if their activity connects back to you.

How to Appeal If You’re Flagged

If you receive this violation, you need a strong Plan of Action

1. Acknowledge the violation under “Selling Policies and Seller Code of Conduct (attempting to damage or abuse another seller).”

2. Root cause: Explain what led to the trigger (e.g., competitor research misunderstood as manipulation).

3. Corrective actions: Stopped risky behavior, separated buyer and seller accounts, ended VA/agency activity.

4. Preventive actions: New SOPs, employee training, contractual bans on review manipulation, internal monitoring.

5. Evidence: Screenshots of buyer account contributions, logs, termination letters, and SOPs.

FAQs

What does “Selling Policies and Seller Code of Conduct (attempting to damage or abuse another seller)” mean?
It refers to Amazon’s “acting fairly” rule, which bans manipulation of reviews, votes, and competitor reputation.

Can voting “helpful” or “unhelpful” get me flagged?
Yes. Voting “helpful” on negative competitor reviews or “unhelpful” on positive competitor reviews is treated as manipulation.

Is buying competitor products safe?
Yes, but only if you do nothing beyond purchasing. Never refund, review, vote, or communicate.

Why was my buyer account banned from reviews?
Amazon detected unusual reviewing or voting activity linked to your seller account.

How do I appeal?
Submit a structured Plan of Action with root cause, corrective actions, preventive actions, and evidence, reaffirming your commitment to “acting fairly.”

Final Word

Amazon’s crackdown on the Selling Policies and Seller Code of Conduct (attempting to damage or abuse another seller) is broader than ever.

The key truth: intent doesn’t matter – patterns do.

That means even one “helpful” click on a negative competitor review, or one refund paired with a review, can be enough to trigger enforcement.

The safest approach is to treat competitor research as a purely internal exercise: buy if necessary, but never refund, never review, never vote, never communicate. Use data tools wherever possible, and keep strict logs of any actions.

If you’ve already been flagged, act quickly with a professional appeal that shows Amazon you understand the issue, have corrected it, and are committed to “acting fairly.”

Need Help?

Received a “Selling Policies and Seller Code of Conduct (attempting to damage or abuse another seller)” warning? Don’t let it escalate. Contact ASA Compliance Group today – we’ve resolved thousands of Code of Conduct and review manipulation cases since 2016, and we know how to protect your account.

Book a Free Compliance Review

Amazon Variation Theme Removal: What Sellers Must Do Before Q4 2025

Amazon Variation Theme Removal 2025: What Every Seller Needs to Know Before Q4

Picture This: Q4, and You’re Locked Out

It’s mid-November. Your best-selling listing is moving thousands of units a week. You go to drop your price by $2 to stay competitive… and Amazon blocks the update.

Error: “the value specified is invalid.”

Your listing is still live. Customers can buy. But you can’t change a single thing – not titles, not keywords, not pricing, not images.

That’s exactly what’s about to happen to thousands of sellers when Amazon retires a large batch of variation themes:

Between September 2, 2025, and November 30, 2025, we will remove variation themes from our product templates that aren’t relevant or frequently used, to simplify your listing experience. We’ve already marked the impacted themes as Deprecated: Do Not Use in the product template Variation Theme Name field.

If you try to update a listing with a deprecated variation theme, you’ll receive an error message that states, “the value specified is invalid” and the update will not be successful.

This change isn’t optional. If your catalog still uses a deprecated theme, you’ll lose the ability to edit until you rebuild those families.

👉 Official removal list: Amazon Variation Themes Planned for Removal (Excel)
👉 Amazon’s policy update: Seller Central – Removal of Irrelevant Variation Themes

Why Amazon Is Forcing This Change

For years, sellers stretched variation themes to the breaking point:

Dropping unrelated products into one family to steal reviews.
Mixing pack counts, fabrics, or even model years under a “Color” or “Size” family.
Creating parent listings with stuffed titles that didn’t match customer expectations.

It confused buyers and damaged trust.

Amazon’s answer is blunt: kill off messy themes and simplify the catalog.

One family = one brand, one product type, one clear difference.

Understanding Variation Themes

✅ Single-Attribute Themes (Best Practice)

Examples: Color, Size, Scent, Shade.
One difference only. Everything else is identical.
Clean, clear, and the least likely to be deprecated.

Example (Home & Kitchen):

Parent: ACME Bed Sheet Set – 400 Thread Count Cotton – Queen
Child: ACME Bed Sheet Set – 400 Thread Count Cotton – Queen – White
Child: ACME Bed Sheet Set – 400 Thread Count Cotton – Queen – Black

⚠️ Dual-Attribute Themes (Allowed in Some Sub-Categories)

Some sub-categories still support two attributes. These can stay — but many are being retired, so confirm in your template.

SizeColor → Apparel, Footwear
ScentSize → Perfume, Supplements
ColorMaterial → Furniture, Jewelry

Example (Apparel, SizeColor):

Parent: ACME Men’s Polo Shirt
Child: ACME Men’s Polo Shirt – Navy – Medium
Child: ACME Men’s Polo Shirt – Navy – Large
Child: ACME Men’s Polo Shirt – Black – Medium
Child: ACME Men’s Polo Shirt – Black – Large

Example (Perfume, ScentSize):

Parent: ACME Eau de Parfum
Child: ACME Eau de Parfum – Jasmine – 50ml
Child: ACME Eau de Parfum – Jasmine – 100ml
Child: ACME Eau de Parfum – Sandalwood – 50ml
Child: ACME Eau de Parfum – Sandalwood – 100ml

❌ Triple & Quadruple Themes (Technically Exist, Don’t Use)

Amazon does support 3- and 4-attribute themes like SizeColorStyle or SizeColorMaterialPattern.

But they’re a UX disaster:

Too many dropdowns → buyers abandon.
Harder to manage in flat files.
If Amazon removes one attribute, the whole family breaks.

Our advice: never go beyond 2 attributes.

Permitted vs. Prohibited Families

Permitted:

Same brand, same product type, same function.
Differ only in the chosen theme attribute(s).

Prohibited (and flagged often):

Mixing brands under one parent.
Putting different generations/models under a Color family.
Sneaking in pack size or material differences without a valid compound theme.
Duplicate children (two “Red” listings).

👉 Rule of thumb: If you’re not 100% sure, split the family. Better to have two clean variations than one invalid one.

Parent vs. Child Titles: Why Amazon Cares

Amazon’s 2025 title rules:

Max 200 characters.
No symbols like ! $ ? _ { } ^ ¬ ¦.
No repeating the same word more than twice.

But here’s the bigger point: title structure drives indexing, CTR, and compliance.

Parent Title

Not buyable. Keep it clean.
No Size/Color/variation values.
Example: ACME Performance Tee – Lightweight Fabric

Child Titles

Buyable. Indexed in search.
Must include variation values.
Example: ACME Performance Tee – Lightweight Fabric – Navy – Medium

Why this matters:

SEO indexing: “Navy” and “Medium” get indexed → long-tail searches convert.
CTR: Buyers click listings that match their query exactly.
Compliance: Overstuffed parent titles are often suppressed.

What Happens If You Don’t Act

Listings remain live, but you won’t be able to update them.
Some families will break apart into stand-alone ASINs, though varaitions would likely remain intact.
Worst case: you’re stuck mid-Q4 without the ability to adjust prices or optimize.

How to Rebuild Families

1. Audit your catalog → Flag any listings marked “Deprecated: Do Not Use.”

2. Confirm allowed themes → Use the Excel removal list + your template’s Valid Values tab.

3. Rebuild:

- Delete the old parent.
- Strip parentage fields from children.
- Create a new parent with an allowed theme.
- Reattach children.

4. Choose your tool:

- Variation Wizard = fast for bulk.
- Flat files = precise control.

5. QA check: Parent not buyable, children consistent, twister displays.

FAQs

Do my listings stop selling if I don’t migrate?
No. Child ASINs remain buyable. You just can’t edit them.

Can I still use SizeColor?
Yes – if your category template still supports it. Many are being retired.

Are 3–4 attribute themes valid?
Technically yes, but they kill buyer experience. Avoid.

Where do I put variation values?
In child titles only. Parents stay clean.

Which tool should I use to rebuild?
Variation Wizard for bulk. Flat files for detailed control.

Final Checklist

Export catalog –> flag Deprecated themes.

Confirm allowed themes (Excel + template).

Rebuild with 1–2 attributes max.

Update titles to 2025 standards.

QA variation display and indexing.

Bottom Line

This isn’t Amazon punishing sellers – it’s Amazon cleaning up catalog abuse.

If you want to avoid locked-out edits during Q4:

Stick to 1–2 attributes max.
Keep parent titles universal.
Put variation values in child titles.
Rebuild before September 2, not in October.

Do it proactively, and you’ll glide through peak season without disruption.

Need Help?

At ASA Compliance Group, we’ve rebuilt thousands of variation families across every category.

Variation Theme Audit (48-hour turnaround):

Catalog scan to flag at-risk families.
Mapping to valid themes.
Compliant flat file or Variation Wizard setup.
QA for titles, twisters, and indexing.

Book a Free Compliance Review

Amazon Mediation (UK/EU) for Sellers: Deadlines, Steps, Fees

Amazon Mediation for Sellers (UK/EU): Deadlines, Steps, and How to Win on Paper

Last updated: August 13, 2025
Who this is for: Amazon sellers registered in the EU or UK who see messages like “Status: Our evaluation is complete. You may have other statutory rights for redress including Mediation” inside Account Health and want a practical, do-it-yourself plan.

Before we begin (important context)

Mediation in the UK/EU is a structured, paper-based process run by an external body. The mediator’s opinion is non-binding. If the mediator recommends in your favor, your share of the fee is refunded, but Amazon still decides whether to implement the recommendation. In the United States, most disputes go to binding arbitration under different rules; that is a different animal and outside the scope of this help article. We do not provide mediation or arbitration services. Our focus is helping sellers fix the underlying issues – appeals, documentation, SOPs, and account health – so that if you choose to mediate, your file is strong.

What changed in 2025 (why timing now matters)

The rules around timing have hardened. Two separate six-month clocks now govern eligibility in practice. First, you must submit your internal appeal within six months of Amazon’s original enforcement decision. Second, if you later want mediation, you must request it within six months of the first internal appeal outcome. In addition, your account must have had active listings in at least one EU or UK store within the twelve months before requesting mediation. If Amazon deems you eligible, they issue a unique code; you must contact the mediator within thirty days of receiving that code, and you can receive up to three codes for the same dispute, each with its own thirty-day window. When Account Health says “our evaluation is complete… you may have other statutory rights including Mediation,” it is effectively signaling that the internal pathway is exhausted for that issue and that the mediation pathway may be available if you meet the criteria and act within the timelines.

Mediation vs. arbitration (so you know which path you’re on)

Mediation is facilitated negotiation guided by a neutral who reviews both sides’ submissions and writes a reasoned, non-binding opinion. It is faster, cheaper, and entirely paper-driven, which means the quality, clarity, and credibility of your documents determine your odds. Arbitration (mostly relevant to U.S. Business Solutions Agreement disputes) is typically binding; an arbitrator’s award is enforceable. This guide deals only with the UK/EU mediation route.

Fees, language, and mediator choice

Expect a fixed case fee set by the appointed scheme, with Amazon covering half and you covering the other half at the start. If the opinion favors you, your share is refunded. The mediator panel is independent; you may be offered two names and a brief window – usually three working days – to choose one before the administrator assigns someone. You can request a proceeding in your preferred supported language, although Amazon may respond in a different language; the mediator will deliver the opinion in your language and in English if required.

AHR-based deactivations (critical nuance)

If your account is deactivated because your Account Health Rating fell below the threshold, the mediation request must explicitly list the specific policy violations you are disputing. The review will focus only on those items. Even if the mediator’s opinion supports you, your account remains deactivated if the Account Health Rating stays below the threshold. In practice, you should continue clearing violations in parallel through internal processes while preparing the mediation file, so you are not blocked by rating mechanics even after a favorable opinion.

The timeline - think in clocks, not steps

There are three timing layers to manage. The first clock starts on the day of Amazon’s initial decision, and you have six months to file your first internal appeal. The second clock starts on the date of the first appeal outcome, and you have six months to request mediation. The third is the code window: once Amazon issues your mediation access code, you have thirty days to open your case with the mediator. If you miss the thirty-day window, you can request another code, but codes are limited to a maximum of three for the same dispute. The safest operational habit is to calendar all three dates the same day you receive any decision, outcome, or code.

How to assemble a winning mediation file

Strong mediation files read like well-argued case studies supported by verifiable documentation. Begin with a clear and narrow ask: specify exactly what you want Amazon to do and why the risk to customers and the marketplace is now low. Provide a factual chronology that is time-bound and specific: what happened, when it happened, who made which decisions, and what Amazon communicated at each step. Present a root cause that is internal, concrete, and credible rather than vague or blame-shifting. Follow with corrective actions that are already implemented and evidenced: think SOPs written as living processes, training plans with dates and attendance, product labeling fixes with before-and-after images, compliance test reports, supplier verification and invoices, and system-level controls that can be audited. Then describe preventive measures that logically address the actual root cause rather than generic “we take quality seriously” language; for example, show how you changed receiving checks, product onboarding, listing governance, safety labeling review, or invoice vetting, and how you monitor these controls over time.

For AHR matters, include an appendix that lists each policy violation you contest by name and date, the associated ASINs where relevant, what you submitted internally to resolve it, and the objective status today. If the dispute centers on a specific ASIN or product family, add a product annex with ingredient or materials documentation, compliance certificates, updated packaging proofs, and any third-party lab results that relate to the claimed defect or policy breach. The mediator is reading; they are not investigating. If you write it, attach it. If you claim it exists, include it. If you changed a process, show the training, the audit, and the proof of use.

Filing sequence that minimizes risk

Work the internal path thoroughly first, because mediation requires that you tried to resolve the dispute through Amazon’s internal complaints handling. When you reach a first appeal outcome you disagree with, record the date, and ask yourself whether the internal process is moving productively. If not, prepare your mediation file while continuing to escalate internally. When Amazon issues the access code, sign the mediation agreement promptly, pay your share of the fee, choose the mediator within the short selection window, and submit your complete file. After submission, there is typically only a brief opportunity to amend; treat the initial filing as the one that counts. The decision window is not long; a well-organized file helps the mediator focus on substance rather than searching for missing exhibits.

Frequent pitfalls that stall otherwise good cases

The most common failure is missing a clock – either the six months from the original decision to your first appeal, or the six months from the appeal outcome to the mediation request, or the thirty days after the access code is issued. The second failure is making the dispute about ineligible topics such as pure FBA operational issues or payments-only matters, which the scheme generally excludes. The third failure is submitting claims without evidence and trying to backfill later; mediation is largely closed-record after the initial window, so weak front-loading is difficult to fix. The fourth is misunderstanding AHR mechanics and assuming that a favorable opinion will auto-reinstate the account while the rating remains below threshold.

Protective mediation (when to pull the trigger)

If you reach the fifth month after your first appeal outcome and internal escalations are producing repetitive or templated responses, consider filing for mediation to preserve your rights while you continue to strengthen documentation, update SOPs, or finalize compliance tests. In areas like product safety, labeling, or formulation changes, the work itself takes time. Protective filing ensures the door does not close while you wait.

If you missed a deadline

If the six-month appeal window expired, or the six-month mediation window from the first outcome passed, or you received three codes and failed to open a case within thirty days of the third code, then this particular dispute is generally no longer eligible for mediation. At that point, the realistic options are to keep working the internal process if it remains open, to examine whether a different, newer enforcement can be disputed on its own merits, and to seek legal advice where appropriate. None of this prevents you from fixing the underlying compliance issues and documenting them thoroughly for future trust and safety scrutiny.

Practical template you can adapt today

Open with a one-paragraph summary that states who you are, the dispute you are raising, the case IDs, and the specific action you want Amazon to take. Follow with a dated chronology from the original decision through each submission and outcome, written in neutral language. Explain the root cause in a single, direct paragraph that owns the failure internally. Describe the corrective actions you have already implemented with references to the attached SOPs, training records, supplier documents, labeling updates, and system controls. Explain the preventive controls now in place and how you will monitor them. Add a brief risk assessment that explains why reinstating the account or ASIN presents low risk today. If this is an AHR deactivation, attach an appendix that lists each policy violation you are disputing and the evidence you have already submitted to resolve or remove it. Close with a short, plain-English request for the mediator’s recommendation and a note that all supporting documents are attached and labeled clearly.

How we can help (without doing mediation for you)

We do not handle mediation or arbitration. Where we help is in the work that actually moves the needle: building a credible Plan of Action, writing SOPs that read like real operational processes, organizing evidence, validating suppliers and invoices, cleaning up labeling, and resolving the specific policy violations that depress Account Health. If you need that kind of help, reach out. If you prefer to do it yourself, use this guide as your checklist and keep your file tight, consistent, and complete.

Legal and editorial notes

This article is intended for informational purposes for EU/UK sellers. It is not legal advice and it is not a substitute for reading your own policies and agreements. Mediation procedures, fees, and timelines can change; always verify the current requirements inside your Seller Central account before you act.

Book a Free Compliance Review

How to Protect Your Amazon Business from the UK Design Patent Scam

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal advice. If you’re facing an intellectual property dispute, please consult a qualified solicitor.

“I Was Selling That Product for Years - Then a Stranger Claimed They Owned It”

We’ve all heard of patent trolls, but very few Amazon sellers expect to be hit by a design troll. Our client James’s story isn’t an isolated incident. We’ve helped dozens of sellers who were blindsided by registered designs covering generic products – kitchen utensils, power banks, LED strips – that have been on the market for years.

In one case, Maya, a seller of silicone baking mats, received a notice from a company she’d never heard of. Her ASIN was taken down, and she was asked for £600. Maya had launched her product in 2019. The design registration was filed in 2025. Because the UKIPO doesn’t check novelty before granting a registration, the design slipped through. This article dives deeper into why that happens, explores what legitimate design rights look like, and offers a comprehensive toolbox for sellers.

1. Design Rights 101: What They Cover and What They Don’t

Design protection is about appearance, not function. A registered design protects the way a product looks – its shape, lines, contours, texture, colours and ornamentation. It doesn’t protect how it works or the idea behind it. You cannot register a purely functional feature (for example, the thread of a screw) as a design.

Key points to remember:

Three‑dimensional vs two‑dimensional: Unregistered UK design rights only protect the shape or configuration of a product, not surface decoration. Registered designs can protect 2D patterns and colour schemes, making them more powerful.
Technical function exclusion: Any design features that are dictated solely by the way the product works are excluded from protection. For instance, the shape of a plug’s pins or a USB connector cannot be protected under design law.
Repair clause: In the EU and UK, spare parts that must replicate a component’s appearance to repair a complex product (like car body panels) may be exempt from infringement. This prevents design rights from creating monopolies in the repair market.

2. Global Perspectives on Design Protection

If you sell internationally, you need to know how design law differs around the world:

United Kingdom: Applications are inexpensive, there’s no novelty search, and rights can last up to 25 years with renewals. This lax registration system is what scammers exploit.
European Union: A Registered Community Design (RCD) provides unitary protection across all EU Member States. It’s also not examined before grant, but the higher filing fee (€350) and the option for EUIPO to refuse or invalidate designs help deter some abuse. An Unregistered Community Design (UCD) offers three years of automatic protection against copying. Post‑Brexit, UK businesses need separate UK and EU registrations to cover both territories.
United States: Design patents protect ornamental aspects for 15 years and undergo substantive examination. They cannot cover colours and require higher filing fees, which reduces frivolous filings.
International registration (Hague System): A single application can cover up to 100 countries. The International Bureau only checks formality; novelty is assessed (or not) by each national office. This can be an efficient route if you’re expanding globally, but it doesn’t solve the novelty‑checking issue.

Understanding these differences helps you decide where to register your designs and anticipate how scammers might exploit gaps in the system.

3. Why UK Designs Are Attractive to Fraudsters

A UK registered design is easy to get and hard to knock out quickly. There’s no novelty search, the fees are minimal, and approvals come through in weeks. On Amazon, an IP complaint referencing a registered design prompts immediate removal. Fraudsters take advantage of this by registering generic products, filing takedowns and demanding payments. Shell companies like Lexer Trading Ltd, Lexerstore Ltd, Vision Bros Ltd and MSK Power Ltd rotate ownership of these rights to keep exploiting sellers.

4. Avoiding the Trap: Proactive Steps

4.1 Search Before You Launch

Use the UKIPO Design Search by product name, class or owner.
Check DesignView, WIPO’s global design database.
Search the EUIPO RCD register for similar designs.
Perform broad online searches and keep records. If you find the same design has been registered recently, consider modifying the appearance or rebranding to avoid conflict.

4.2 Register Your Own Designs

Protect your product’s appearance by filing your own registration. Applications start at £50. You can include up to 50 designs in one application, which is cost-effective if you have variations. EU‑wide protection is €350 for five years. If you sell globally, consider the Hague System. Registering not only deters copycats but also positions you as the rights holder if someone else tries to claim your design.

4.3 Keep a Design Dossier

Document your design journey: sketches, prototypes, invoices, photos, and early listings. Dated evidence proves your product predates a fraudulent registration. Digital files with time stamps and physical samples (like dated prototype models) can be invaluable in court or in Amazon appeals.

4.4 Vet Suppliers Carefully

Ask suppliers for proof they own or are authorised to sell the design. Include IP warranties and indemnities in your purchase contracts. Require that suppliers notify you if they become aware of any IP issues. This minimises the risk of accidentally selling infringing products.

4.5 Combine Design Rights with Other IP

While design rights protect appearance, trade marks protect your brand identifiers (names, logos) and can be used to enforce against counterfeit listings. Patents cover functional innovations, and copyright can protect artistic works. A layered IP strategy makes it harder for trolls to copy your entire product offering.

4.6 Build an Internal IP Policy

Establish a process within your business to:

Record new designs as soon as they’re created.
Decide which products are worth registering.
Conduct regular audits of your listings for IP compliance.
Train your team to spot suspicious IP claims and invoices.

This institutionalises IP vigilance so you’re always one step ahead.

5. How to Respond to a Design Complaint

5.1 First Steps

Remove the listing temporarily to prevent further strikes or potential account suspension.
Check the design registration’s filing date and images to see if they predate your product launch.
Gather evidence of prior use and sales. A well-organised design dossier will make this easy.

5.2 Build Your Case

If the design was filed after your product launched, you have strong grounds to challenge it. Compare your evidence against the registration details.
File for an invalidation through the UKIPO. If the proprietor doesn’t respond, you might get a decision in a few months; a defended case takes longer.
Use Amazon’s “Abuse Prevention” or “Notice of Misuse” channels to report the complaint as systemic abuse. The more sellers report the same entities, the higher the chances of platform action.
If the complainant asks for money, refuse. Extortion demands can be used as evidence of an unjustified threat.

5.3 Legal Tools

Interim Injunctions: In urgent cases where a design claim is clearly abusive, courts can order the complainant to stop filing complaints.
Unjustified Threats Actions: If someone threatens you with infringement proceedings or demands payment for a dubious design, you can sue for damages. Even sending a letter threatening such action can encourage them to withdraw.
ADR and Mediation: For legitimate disputes, alternative dispute resolution can be faster and cheaper than court. Consider mediation if both parties are willing to negotiate.

5.4 What If You’ve Already Paid?

Scammers often cycle through multiple shell companies. If you’ve paid:

Do not pay another company.
Document the communication and payment.
Consult a solicitor about recovering the fee and possibly pursuing damages.
Notify Amazon that you paid under duress and still received further claims.

6. Beyond Amazon: Other IP Scams to Watch

Misleading invoices – Rogue entities send renewal invoices for designs, trademarks or patents. The UKIPO says never pay them; report them instead.
Academic IP fraud – Companies sell “inventorship” slots on UK designs to academics seeking promotions. This illustrates the broader problem of design registration misuse.
Fake registries – Some services promise to include your IP in “international databases” for a fee. These listings offer no legal benefit and are often scams.

7. Implementing IP Safeguards in Your Amazon Business

Design protection shouldn’t be reactive. Here’s how to make it part of your strategy:

Brand Registry: Enrol in Amazon’s Brand Registry with a registered trade mark. It provides enhanced reporting tools, automated protections and the ability to remove counterfeit listings quickly.
Monitoring: Use third-party tools or Amazon’s own Brand Analytics to monitor your listings for IP claims and hijackers.
Take-Down Counter Notices: Familiarise yourself with Amazon’s procedures for counter-notices. Knowing the process ahead of time reduces panic if you’re ever targeted.
Networking: Join seller forums and industry groups. Collective knowledge helps identify emerging scams and bad actors quickly.

8. Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I register the same design in the UK and EU?
Yes. Post‑Brexit, UK and EU designs are separate. You need to file in both jurisdictions if you want protection across Europe.

Q: What if my design is similar but not identical?
For registered designs, infringement is based on overall impression. Minor changes may not avoid infringement. Seek legal advice if in doubt.

Q: Do I need to register every variation?
You can include multiple variations in one application (up to 50 in the UK). Group similar designs to save costs, but ensure they are distinct enough to be considered separate designs.

Q: How long do I have to file for an invalidation?
There’s no strict deadline, but acting quickly helps reduce the harm from ongoing takedowns and may deter trolls.

9. Pushing for Change

We advocate for reforms such as:

Introducing a pre‑grant opposition period or basic novelty check.
Requiring proof of commercial use before a takedown.
Encouraging Amazon to flag high‑risk design complaints for manual review.
Educating sellers on IP rights and scams.

We work with professional associations and regulators to champion these changes. If you have experienced design abuse, consider submitting feedback to the UKIPO or Amazon to support systemic improvements.

10. Conclusion & Next Steps

Design rights are a double‑edged sword. They protect genuine creativity but, when unchecked, enable scammers. As a seller, you can protect yourself by searching and registering your designs, keeping meticulous records, integrating IP safeguards into your operations, and acting quickly when complaints arise. If you need help navigating a design dispute or want to fortify your IP strategy, we’re here for you.

Book a Free Compliance Review

Amazon’s “Attempting to Damage or Abuse Another Seller” Violation: What It Means and How to Avoid It